Every winter, Delhi’s air turns hostile. We speak of smog, of choking lungs, of emergency measures, of temporary fixes. We debate numbers on an AQI scale and brace ourselves for the next announcement — odd-even, construction bans, school closures. And yet, once the air clears marginally, so does our collective urgency.
This approach is deeply flawed.
Delhi’s air pollution crisis cannot be understood or solved through a seasonal prism. It is not an episodic failure of weather or a short-term administrative lapse. It is the outcome of systemic choices in how we have planned, governed, and moved through our city over decades. If we continue to rely on bandage solutions, we will continue to suffocate, slowly but surely.
What Delhi needs is not another annual firefight, but a coherent, structural response. Allow me to outline this through a few clear steps.
From open city to endless sprawl: For years, Delhi has taken pride in being an open, green Capital. But this openness has quietly decayed into an unchecked sprawl. We have moved away from the time-tested principles of compact, high-density urban planning and instead produced a city where daily commutes of 50 to 70 kilometers have become normal.
As economic prosperity rises, the first symbol of success often becomes a personal vehicle. Not because people reject public transport, but because the city leaves them little choice. This dependence on private vehicles has inevitably led to congestion; and congestion, not just vehicle numbers, is one of the primary contributors to vehicular pollution.
The solution is not to scold citizens or restrict them intermittently. It is to provide a sustainable, affordable, and safe alternative: An active, vibrant, and reliable public transport ecosystem.
Public transport fails without last mile connectivity: Delhi often celebrates the expansion of its Metro network, and rightly so. But the conversation routinely misses a critical point, the last mile. Unless our daughters, sisters and mothers can safely step out of their home and reach the metro gate without fear or inconvenience, public transport will never be the first choice. Safety, walkability, lighting, footpaths, and universal access are not peripheral issues; they are central to reducing vehicular dependence.
Rethinking land use, the case for mixed-use cities: The introduction of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) into Delhi’s Master Plan is a welcome and necessary shift. It signals a move away from a mid-20th-century planning model that rigidly separated residential, commercial, and institutional zones. That model forces millions to traverse the city daily for work, health care, education, or recreation.
The alternative is mixed-use development, neighborhoods where people can walk or cycle to work, to school, to clinics, or to public spaces.
This is not merely an urban design preference. It is a public health imperative. Reduced travel distances directly translate into reduced emissions and healthier air.
Air does not respect administrative boundaries: Air pollution cannot be tackled through isolated, micro-zonal interventions. We may measure AQI in specific localities, but air moves far beyond municipal or state borders.
Delhi is fortunate to sit within a larger metropolitan region, the NCR; where coordination across states is not just possible but essential. Fragmented action will always fail. A shared air-shed requires shared responsibility, shared data, and shared enforcement mechanisms.
Industry must be enabled to pollute less: Industrial pollution remains a significant contributor, yet the conversation often defaults to blame rather than reform.
What industries need are incentives; fiscal, regulatory, and technological to adopt cleaner machinery and pollution-free processes. Encouraging sustainable production through policy support will yield far better results than punitive approaches alone. Private enterprise responds to clarity and consistency; both must come from the state.
Congestion is a governance problem, not a road-width problem: Vehicular pollution is exacerbated not simply by traffic volume, but by congestion, and congestion is often the result of poor enforcement.
Across Delhi, roads are illegally encroached upon while state-of-the-art multi-level parking facilities sit unused just meters away. This is not a planning failure; it is a governance failure.
Effective enforcement of parking and traffic regulations would yield immediate dividends.: Smoother traffic flow, lower emissions, and safer streets. Official apathy cannot be allowed to undermine public health.
Dust control is about management, not climate: Open dust along roads and vacant plots remains an overlooked contributor to poor air quality. Even cities in arid climates have demonstrated that this can be managed effectively through native vegetation, horticultural measures, and ground cover.
In Delhi’s climate, such interventions are relatively easy. What is missing is sustained management; protecting plantations, preventing grazing, and ensuring maintenance. Once again, the issue is not knowledge but execution.
Some of the world’s largest cities have faced air quality crises of similar magnitude and emerged cleaner, healthier, and more liveable; not through seasonal measures, but through sustained, systemic reform. Delhi is no exception.
The question is not whether solutions exist. They do. The question is whether we are willing to move beyond optics and address the deeper structural causes of our polluted air.
Delhi does not need another winter emergency. It needs long-term urban thinking, coordinated governance, and the courage to plan for people, not just for vehicles.
Dikshu C Kukreja is managing principal, CP Kukreja Architects, and is honorary consul general, Republic of Albania. The views expressed are personal
